VMFL017

VMFL017
Transonic Flow over an RAE 2822 Airfoil

Overview

Reference
P.H. Cook, M.A. McDonald, M.C.P. Firmin, “AEROFOIL RAE 2822 Pressure Distribution and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements”. AGARD Advisory Report. No. 138. 1979.
S.J. Kline, B.J. Cantwell, G.M. Lilley, “1980-81 AFOSR-HTTM-Stanford Conference on Complex Turbulent Flows: Comparison of Computation and Experiment”, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1982.
SolverAnsys Fluent, Ansys CFX
Physics/ModelsCompressible, turbulent flow
Input File
r2822.cas for Ansys Fluent
VMFL017.def for Ansys CFX
Project FilesLink to Project Files Download Page

Test Case

Flow over an RAE 2822 airfoil at a free-stream Mach number of 0.73. The angle of attack is 2.79°. The flow field is 2D, compressible (transonic), and turbulent. The geometry of the RAE 2822 airfoil is shown in Figure 42: Geometry of the RAE 2822 Airfoil . It is a thick airfoil with a chord length, c, of 1.00 m and a maximum thickness, d, of 0.121 m. The flow domain spans over 100 Chord lengths in both streamwise and transverse directions, so that the presence of the airfoil is not felt at the outer boundary.

Figure 42: Geometry of the RAE 2822 Airfoil

Geometry of the RAE 2822 Airfoil

Material PropertiesGeometry Boundary Conditions

Fluid: Air

  • Density: Ideal Gas

  • Viscosity: 1.983 x 10-5 kg/m-s

  • Thermal conductivity: 0.0242 W/m-K

  • Molecular Weight: 28.966 g/mol

  • Specific Heat: 1006.43 J/kg-K

Chord length = 1 m

Maximum thickness = 0.121 m

The inlet conditions are:

Mach number = 0.73

Re = 6.5 x 106

Static pressure = 43765 Pa

Inlet temperature = 300 K

Turbulent intensity = 0.05 %

Turbulent viscosity ratio = 10

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The implicit formulation of the density-based solver is used. The SST k-ω turbulence model is used to account for turbulence effects. The problem is solved in steady state mode. The experimental procedure included uses a transition trip to fix the boundary layer transition.

Results Comparison for Ansys Fluent

Table 15: Comparison of Coefficients

CoefficientsTarget Ansys Fluent Ratio
Drag 0.01680.0160.952
Lift 0.8030.780.971

Results Comparison for Ansys CFX

Table 16: Comparison of Coefficients

CoefficientsTarget Ansys Fluent Ratio
Drag 0.01680.01620.9662
Lift 0.8030.79810.9339