Problem Description
A cantilevered bend pipe is modeled with a ratio of outer radius to wall thickness equal to 45.36. Single point response spectrum analysis is performed on the model with base excitation along the global X, Y and Z directions.
The input files for this problem are listed below:
demonstration-problem1-290 Input Listing |
demonstration-problem1-281 Input Listing |
demonstration-problem1-18 Input Listing |
Material Properties:
Young's modulus = 24e6 psi |
Poisson's ratio = 0.3 |
Density = 0.000125 lb-sec2/in4 |
Geometric Properties:
Outer diameter = 10.932 inches |
Wall thickness = 0.1205 inches |
Radius of curvature = 36.30 inches |
Loading:
Acceleration response spectrum curve is input on the SV and FREQ commands.
Results
Results Comparison
Table 1.1: Frequencies Obtained from Modal Solution
Mode | Results from SHELL281 (A) | Results from PIPE18 (B) | Results from ELBOW290 (C) | Ratio between A and B | Ratio between A and C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 145.554 | 90.588 | 145.641 | 1.606 | 0.999 |
2 | 149.530 | 100.503 | 149.613 | 1.487 | 0.999 |
3 | 315.404 | 418.040 | 315.392 | 0.754 | 1.000 |
4 | 319.433 | 480.193 | 319.425 | 0.665 | 1.000 |
5 | 575.655 | 1241.493 | 575.845 | 0.463 | 0.999 |
6 | 604.193 | 1335.526 | 604.387 | 0.452 | 0.999 |
7 | 757.127 | 2260.454 | 757.039 | 0.334 | 1.000 |
8 | 760.925 | 2505.754 | 760.827 | 0.303 | 1.000 |
9 | 947.803 | 2771.559 | 948.182 | 0.341 | 0.999 |
10 | 982.926 | 3852.258 | 983.168 | 0.255 | 0.999 |
11 | 1001.878 | 3852.333 | 1001.868 | 0.260 | 1.000 |
12 | 1242.305 | 5223.342 | 1242.931 | 0.237 | 0.999 |
13 | 1271.296 | 5279.894 | 1271.867 | 0.240 | 0.999 |
14 | 1368.966 | 6010.645 | 1368.740 | 0.227 | 1.000 |
15 | 1411.341 | 6673.827 | 1411.654 | 0.211 | 0.999 |
Conclusion
The result comparison table and Figure 1.1: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from PIPE18 Elements, Figure 1.2: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from ELBOW290 Elements, and Figure 1.3: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from SHELL281 Elements show that the results obtained from modal and spectrum analyses with ELBOW290 elements closely match with the results obtained from SHELL281 elements. The results obtained from PIPE18 elements are off by more than 50% when compared with SHELL281 results due to the limitations explained in Piping Benchmarks using Current Technology Elements.