1.3. Demonstration Problem 1

Problem Description

A cantilevered bend pipe is modeled with a ratio of outer radius to wall thickness equal to 45.36. Single point response spectrum analysis is performed on the model with base excitation along the global X, Y and Z directions.

The input files for this problem are listed below:

Material Properties:

Young's modulus = 24e6 psi
Poisson's ratio = 0.3
Density = 0.000125 lb-sec2/in4

Geometric Properties:

Outer diameter = 10.932 inches
Wall thickness = 0.1205 inches
Radius of curvature = 36.30 inches

Loading:

Acceleration response spectrum curve is input on the SV and FREQ commands.

Results

Figure 1.1: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from PIPE18 Elements

Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from PIPE18 Elements

Figure 1.2: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from ELBOW290 Elements

Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from ELBOW290 Elements

Figure 1.3: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from SHELL281 Elements

Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from SHELL281 Elements

Results Comparison

Table 1.1: Frequencies Obtained from Modal Solution

ModeResults from SHELL281 (A)Results from PIPE18 (B)Results from ELBOW290 (C)Ratio between A and BRatio between A and C
1145.55490.588145.6411.6060.999
2149.530100.503149.6131.4870.999
3315.404418.040315.3920.7541.000
4319.433480.193319.4250.6651.000
5575.6551241.493575.8450.4630.999
6604.1931335.526604.3870.4520.999
7757.1272260.454757.0390.3341.000
8760.9252505.754760.8270.3031.000
9947.8032771.559948.1820.3410.999
10982.9263852.258983.1680.2550.999
111001.8783852.3331001.8680.2601.000
121242.3055223.3421242.9310.2370.999
131271.2965279.8941271.8670.2400.999
141368.9666010.6451368.7400.2271.000
151411.3416673.8271411.6540.2110.999

Table 1.2: Displacements and Stresses Obtained from Spectrum Solution

Result QuantitiesResults from SHELL281 (A)Results from PIPE18 (B)Results from ELBOW290 (C)Ratio between A and BRatio between A and C
Maximum displacement Vector Sum4.99 x 10-41.23 x 10-34.94 x 10-40.4071.012
Maximum equivalent stress33.14441.91527.6330.7901.199

Conclusion

The result comparison table and Figure 1.1: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from PIPE18 Elements, Figure 1.2: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from ELBOW290 Elements, and Figure 1.3: Nodal Equivalent Stress Plot Obtained from SHELL281 Elements show that the results obtained from modal and spectrum analyses with ELBOW290 elements closely match with the results obtained from SHELL281 elements. The results obtained from PIPE18 elements are off by more than 50% when compared with SHELL281 results due to the limitations explained in Piping Benchmarks using Current Technology Elements.