The global equation of motion in the time domain is given by:
(10–12) |
where is the assembled
structural and added mass matrix in the fixed reference axes,
is the
unknown acceleration vector, and
is the total applied force vector on all of the
element nodes.
Due to the high frequencies present in the higher modes of vibration, a semi-implicit two-stage predictor corrector scheme is used to integrate in time for velocity and displacement.
The higher frequencies, and hence the semi-implicit aspect of the formulation, involve the forces due to structural bending. We thus rewrite Equation 10–12 as
(10–13) |
where the is assembled
structural stiffness matrix,
is the displacement vector over
all nodes, and
is a vector representing forces
other than those due to structural stiffness.
At the first stage of the integration scheme, we write
(10–14) |
where and
are the known displacement and velocity vectors, respectively, of
nodes at time t.
This equation leads to a solution for
acceleration at the predictor stage, from which predictions and
for nodal
velocities and displacements at time
may be made:
(10–15) |
At the corrector stage, the acceleration is determined from
(10–16) |
where the added mass and forces at are calculated using
and
.
The final solutions for velocity and
displacement at time are then given by
(10–17) |
For some extreme cases of loading, the
above time-centered scheme may be unstable. A factor is therefore introduced to
make the formulation non-time-centered, which increases the stability
but reduces the accuracy. Introducing
gives:
(10–18) |
When the value of is 0.5, the expressions for
and
in Equation 10–18 equate to the formulas given by Equation 10–15 and Equation 10–16 respectively. Tests have shown that
the optimum value for
is 0.54, which gives the best trade-off of stability
and accuracy when employing Equation 10–18.