51.7. Results and Discussion

A comparative study of all three methods shows the effectiveness of the beam-to-beam simulation (Case 3).

Displacement

The total deformation plots are shown for the three models. The values are similar for all three.

Figure 51.16: Total Deformation Plots for all Three Cases

Total Deformation Plots for all Three Cases

von Mises Stress

Von Mises stress (SEQV) is plotted for the three models. The plots show that maximum stress occurs at a similar location in all three models, and the overall stress pattern is similar.

Figure 51.17: von Mises Stress

von Mises Stress

Computational Time

The following table compares simulation time and cumulative iterations for the three cases.

DMP run

(8 processors)

Case 1:

Solid Tube / Solid Coil

Case 2:

Solid Tube / Beam Coil

Case 3:

Beam Tube / Beam Coil

Wall time (s)1783033531127
Cumulative iterations741359134

The above data shows that the beam-to-beam simulation (Case 3) is less computationally expensive than the solid model.

Conclusion

The comparison of von Mises stress and computation time for these models illustrates that similar results and reduced computation time can be achieved by using a simplified beam model and beam-to-beam contact.