A single progress variable, , is used to describe
the progress of the global reaction:
(7–39) |
The composition of the fluid is determined by blending the compositions
of the non-reacted state (fresh gases) and the reacted state (burned
gases), where corresponds to fresh materials and
corresponds to fully
reacted materials.
In turbulent flow, a bimodal distribution of is assumed.
At any given time and position in space the fluid is considered to
be either fresh materials or fully reacted. This assumption is justified
if the chemical reaction is fast compared to the integral turbulent
time scales of the flow.
Then, the averaged reaction progress variable, , is the probability
for the instantaneous state of the fluid being reacted. The mean species
composition of the fluid is computed according to:
(7–40) |
For example, if , then the fluid at the given position will
be fully reacted during 60% of time and non-reacted during
the remaining 40% of time.
The reaction progress variable is computed by solving a transport equation:
(7–41) |
The default value of the turbulent Schmidt number for the reaction progress variable is
.
In the limits of pure fuel and pure oxidizer, the reaction progress is not well defined because burnt and unburnt conditions correspond to the same physical state:
(7–42) |
(7–43) |
This poses the issue of which boundary value to specify for when the mixture
is either pure fuel or pure oxidizer. Even though different values
for
correspond to the same mixture
composition, it is still important to impose the proper value on the
boundary, because it controls the combustion regime in the domain
after mixing has occurred:
corresponds with premixed combustion
corresponds with non-premixed combustion (diffusion flame)
In most cases, is appropriate for fuel inlets (in fact,
if
for fuel the Flamelet model could be used
and not solve for
at all). For oxidizer inlets,
the appropriate boundary value depends on the mixing process in the
domain:
for oxidizer premixing with fuel (e.g., primary air)
for oxidizer mixing with products (e.g., secondary air)
However, which case applies may not be known prior to the simulation.
In case of a flow split, it may even be that both cases occur for
the same oxidizer inlet. In this situation, the artificial distinction
between "burnt air" () and "fresh air"
(
) may cause unphysical behavior such as
even fuel being generated by mixing of products with fresh air. For
example, mixing "fresh air" (
,
) with products (
,
) would result in a mixture that is only partially
burnt (
,
). The reaction progress of the resulting mixture
equals the fraction of products
, equivalent to fuel being re-established.
This is unphysical. The correct behavior would be obtained by mixing
products with "burnt air" (
,
).