VM190

VM190
Ferromagnetic Inductor

Overview

Reference: S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, NY, 1985, pg. 14, ex. 1-1.
Analysis Type(s): Static Magnetic Field Analysis (ANTYPE = 0)
Element Type(s):

Tetrahedral Coupled-Field Solid Elements (SOLID98)

3D Infinite Boundary Elements (INFIN47)

Current Source Elements (SOURC36)

Input Listing:

vm190.dat

VM190 requires a supplemental .cdb input file which is too long to include full input listings. This file must be downloaded and placed in your working directory for the test case to run properly. Additionally, the geometry and mesh should be regenerated.

Download link: MAPDL Test Case Files for 2024 R2

vm190.cdb

Test Case

A ferromagnetic core is wound with a 200-turn coil wrapped around one leg. Determine the mmf drop in the iron core for a coil current of 1 ampere.

Figure 292: Ferromagnetic Inductor Problem Sketch

Ferromagnetic Inductor Problem Sketch

Material PropertiesGeometric PropertiesLoading
ur = 2500 (iron)
h = 60 cm
L = 55 cm
w = 10 cm
a = 15 cm
b = 30 cm
c = 10 cm
I = 1.0 Ampere

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Since the core material has finite permeability air is modelled to a small distance away from the core. The open boundary is modelled with an infinite surface element at the edge of the air region. The model employs 1/4 symmetry (about the Y and Z planes). The current source is modelled by a coil primitive. Dimensions of the coil are arbitrarily chosen since they have no bearing on the mmf calculations.

The iron core, linked by a coil, has no air-gap, hence a multiply-connected domain exists requiring the use of the Generalized Scalar Potential (GSP) formulation. The GSP strategy requires three solution steps, controlled by the MAGOPT command.

The mmf drop in the iron is calculated by a line integral around the iron core. According to Ampere's law,  H   d  =l, where H is the field intensity, and I is the enclosed current (or mmf drop). The integral is set up and calculated using the path logic in POST1.

Results Comparison

TargetMechanical APDLRatio
mmf drop (A-t)200198.850.994

Figure 293: Magnetic Flux Density

Magnetic Flux Density