VM-AM-MECH-002

VM-AM-MECH-002
Additive Manufacture of Thin-Walled Canonical Part Using Inconel 718

Overview

Reference: Model and experimental results from America Makes, Project #4026, March 2017
Material:Inconel 718
Supports Included:No
Solver(s): Additive in Mechanical
Physics/Modes:Linked Transient Thermal - Static Structural
Platform:Windows only

Test Case

Perform a simulation of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process of a thin-walled canonical part printed with Inconel 718 nickel chromium alloy.

Find the distortion in the X direction along an edge of the part and compare results to measurements taken of the built part.

Figure 182: Built Part

Built Part

Figure 183: Schematic

Schematic

Figure 184: Schematic Showing Interior Thin Walls

Schematic Showing Interior Thin Walls

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The simulation includes a build step and a cooldown step. Heat is applied at a constant temperature (80°C) to the underside of the base plate during the build step. Room-temperature convection is applied to that same surface during the cooldown step. Throughout the simulation the base plate is anchored by a fixed boundary condition on the underside of the plate. Ansys predefined material properties are used for Inconel 718 from the Additive Manufacturing Materials library. Deflection results from the vertical centerline of a side face are verified by comparing to experimental data. The analysis is performed using a Cartesian mesh.

Build SettingsBuild ConditionsCooldown Conditions
Deposition/Powder Layer Thickness = 0.03 mmPreheat Temperature = 80°CRoom Temperature = 22°C
Hatch Spacing = 0.1 mmGas Temperature = 80°CGas Temperature = 22°C
Scan Speed = 1000 mm/secPowder Temperature = 80°CPowder Temperature = 22°C
Dwell Time = 10 secGas Convection Coeff = 0.00001 W/mm2°CGas Convection Coeff = 0.00001 W/mm2°C
Dwell Time Multiple = 1Powder Convection Coeff = 0.00001 W/mm2°CPowder Convection Coeff = 0.00001 W/mm2°C
Number of heat sources = 1Powder Property Factor = 0.01Powder Property factor = 0.01
Mesh and Material Settings
Element size = 0.4 mm Cartesian mesh
Projection Factor = 0.5

Results Comparison

The distortion in the X direction as calculated by both solvers follows the trend of the measured results.

ResultsTargetMechanicalError (%)
X Deformation at Z = 4.83 mm-0.11-0.115865.327
X Deformation Maximum-0.359-0.34817-3.017

Figure 185: Comparison of Predicted X Deflection Along Edge to Measured Data - Additive in Mechanical

Comparison of Predicted X Deflection Along Edge to Measured Data - Additive in Mechanical