VM-LSDYNA-WB-003

VM-LSDYNA-WB-003
Response of Spring-Mass-Damper System

Overview

Reference:

C. M. Close & D. R. Frederick. (1994) Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems (2nd ed.).New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 314-315.

G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell, & A. Emami-Naeini. (1994). Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 126-127.

Analysis Type(s): Explicit Dynamics with Workbench LS-DYNA
Element Type(s):

Solid, Spring Connection

Input Files:Link to Input Files Download Page

Test Case

The one-degree-of-freedom system consists of a spring K and mass M with viscous damping C. There are two loading cases:

  • Case 1: f(t) = A = constant (step input)

  • Case 2: f(t) = At (ramp input)

For this underdamped system, the displacement of M for Case 1 overshoots the steady-state static displacement. The overshoot and the peak time, tp are compared to theory outlined in Close and Frederick (1994). Based on the discussion in Franklin, Powell, and Emami-Naeini (1994), the mass velocity in response to the ramp input, in theory, is equal to the mass displacement due to the step input.

Figure 5: Problem Sketch

Problem Sketch

Figure 6: Workbench Model

Workbench Model

Material PropertiesGeometric PropertiesLoading

Mass

M = 1.0 kg

Spring

K = 16π2 N/m

Damper

C = 0.21545376

Spring

Length = 1 m

Case 1:

A step force input, f (t) = 16π2 on the mass M in the +x direction.

Case 2:

A ramp force input, f(t) = (16π2)t, on the mass M in the +x direction.

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The magnitude of the step force input for Case 1 was chosen to equal the spring stiffness constant to produce a steady-state static deflection of unity. The ramp input for Case 2 was defined such that the input for Case 1 is the time derivative of the input for Case 2. The value of the stiffness constant was chosen so that the system undamped natural frequency equals 2 Hz. The damping constant was chosen to produce a damping ratio that results in a theoretical 50% overshoot of the steady-state deflection for the step input.

As outlined in Franklin, Powell, and Emami-Naeini (1994), for a single DOF system subjected to a step input, the relationship between overshoot, Mp, and damping ratio, ζ, is given by:

For the system shown in the problem sketch above:

The expression for peak time, tp, which is the time to reach xmax is given by:

where ωn is the system undamped natural frequency in units of radians per second.

Results Comparison

Table 1: Case 1: Step Input

TargetWorkbench LS-DYNAError (%)
Maximum Ux of Mass-1.5000-1.499-0.001
Peak Time for Mass Ux0.254920.254920.000

Table 2: Case 2: Ramp Input

TargetWorkbench LS-DYNAError (%)
Maximum Vx of Mass-1.5000-1.499-0.005
Peak Time for Mass Vx0.254920.254920.000