VM228

VM228
Radiation Between Infinite Coaxial Cylinders

Overview

Reference:R. Siegel, J. R. Howell, Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. 3d ed. Hemisphere Publishing, 1992, p. 204–205, and 240.
Analysis Type(s):Steady State Radiosity
Element Type(s):
2D 6-Node Triangular Thermal Solid Elements (PLANE35)
2D Radiosity Surface Elements (SURF251)
Input Listing:vm228.dat

VM228 requires a supplemental .cdb input file which is too long to include full input listings. This file must be downloaded and placed in your working directory for the test case to run properly. Additionally, the geometry and mesh should be regenerated.

Download link: MAPDL Test Case Files for 2024 R2

vm228-1.cdb, vm228-1.iges

vm228-2.cdb, vm228-2.iges

Test Case

Two concentric infinite cylinders are transferring heat to each other through radiation. The problem is modeled as a 2D pair of concentric circles. The facing surfaces are given surface emissivity values, the non facing surfaces are at fixed temperatures.

Figure 379: Finite Element Model of Problem using Triangular Thermal Solid Elements (PLANE35)

Finite Element Model of Problem using Triangular Thermal Solid Elements (PLANE35)


Material PropertiesGeometric PropertiesLoading
E = 30e6
Kxx = 1
ρ = 0.21
αx = .21
νxy = .27
r1 = 1
r2 = 4
σ = 1.19e-11
Interior of exterior cylinder ε = 1
Exterior of interior cylinder ε =1
All other surfaces ε = 0
Exterior of Exterior cylinder T = 1000
Interior of Interior cylinder T = 100

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The cylinders are assumed to be infinite length, with no end effects, and with uniform surface characteristics. As such, any point on one surface should have the same view factor and characteristics as any other point on the same surface.

F(11) = 0 As a circle, it cannot see itself from any part of its surface.
F(12) = 1 Consequence of no radiation to space
F(21) = (A1/A2)F(12) Basic rule of view factors
F(21) = (r1/r2)F(12)
F(21) = r1/r2
F(22) = 1 - (r1/r2) Consequence of no radiation to space

As a check on the system, the heat flux at two points are compared to that expected by σ(T14 - T24)

A second solution of the test case is performed using radiosity surface elements. These elements are applied to all surfaces which have loads with the RDSF flag. The total number of radiation elements is reduced using the RDEC command.

Results Comparison

 TargetMechanical APDLRatio
PLANE35
F(11)0.0000.0000.00
F(21)0.2500.2491.00
F(22)0.7500.7511.00
Heat flux (interior) at node(0,-1,0)11.53711.0350.96
Heat flux (exterior) at node(0,-4,0)2.8842.7420.95
PLANE35 and SURF251
F(11)0.0000.0000.00
F(21)0.2500.2491.00
F(22)0.7500.7511.00
Heat flux (interior) at node(0,-1,0)11.53711.0350.96
Heat flux (exterior) at node(0,-4,0)2.8842.7470.95